Cover Up Again

[wi11ow 2,657]

The Crown Prosecution Service believes there is "sufficient evidence" to prove the force broke health and safety lawsThe Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, Sir Peter Fahy, is to be prosecuted after an unarmed man was shot dead by an officer.

 

what for shooting a man dead

 

 

 

 

BUT THE SHOOTER walks free

 

 

It later emerged the unarmed father of two had been wrongly suspected of stealing a memory stick containing the names of police informants

 

 

 

so this is right

 

 

 

[paulus 26]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25759909

[wi11ow 2,657]

so they shoot you and walk free i woke up one morning to a knock on the door the POLICE a armed officer pointing a gun a me hand shaking and there trained at what being scared you could not trust him another older officer moved him away

 

 

 

and yer wrong house

[Nik_B 3,790]

That's what bothers me as well, do they keep their safety catches on? I doubt it.

[wi11ow 2,657]

nik b he was shiting him self to late if it went off

[paulus 26]

if that's the case then the selection process is flawed

[wi11ow 2,657]

[paulus 26]

im sorry mate but mark duggan had picked up a gun, the moral high ground was lost at that point.

[wi11ow 2,657]

but there trained to no the difference not just shoot i hope i was right

[paulus 26]

but there trained to no the difference not just shoot i hope i was right

they are the ones standing in-front of what they believe/are told is an an armed suspect, they have split seconds to decide shoot or not, get it wrong and the chances are it will be them in the body bag, as with all these shooting there is criminality somewhere associated with the victim, take duggen the officer knew he had picked up the pistol so had to make the call as to whether he was a threat or not at the point of the stop,

[Nik_B 3,790]

I don't have a problem with the shooting of Duggan I do have a problem how they feel it's ok to go round point guns at unarmed people willy nilly

[wi11ow 2,657]

 

but there trained to no the difference not just shoot i hope i was right

they are the ones standing in-front of what they believe/are told is an an armed suspect, they have split seconds to decide shoot or not, get it wrong and the chances are it will be them in the body bag, as with all these shooting there is criminality somewhere associated with the victim, take duggen the officer knew he had picked up the pistol so had to make the call as to whether he was a threat or not at the point of the stop,

 

 

 

thats why its good to have debates the grass they used to tell the police he had a gun sent him for it SET UP

[paulus 26]

 

 

but there trained to no the difference not just shoot i hope i was right

they are the ones standing in-front of what they believe/are told is an an armed suspect, they have split seconds to decide shoot or not, get it wrong and the chances are it will be them in the body bag, as with all these shooting there is criminality somewhere associated with the victim, take duggen the officer knew he had picked up the pistol so had to make the call as to whether he was a threat or not at the point of the stop,

 

 

 

thats why its good to have debates the grass they used to tell the police he had a gun sent him for it SET UP

 

how can knowingly collecting an illegal firearm whether he was sent to collect it or not be a set up, what did he think he was collecting a truffle. as i said there is nearly always criminal association with the people who get shot by the police

[wi11ow 2,657]

 

 

 

but there trained to no the difference not just shoot i hope i was right

they are the ones standing in-front of what they believe/are told is an an armed suspect, they have split seconds to decide shoot or not, get it wrong and the chances are it will be them in the body bag, as with all these shooting there is criminality somewhere associated with the victim, take duggen the officer knew he had picked up the pistol so had to make the call as to whether he was a threat or not at the point of the stop,

 

 

 

thats why its good to have debates the grass they used to tell the police he had a gun sent him for it SET UP

 

how can knowingly collecting an illegal firearm whether he was sent to collect it or not be a set up, what did he think he was collecting a truffle. as i said there is nearly always criminal association with the people who get shot by the police

 

 

 

law innocent until proven guilty NOT get shot then prove your not guilty there to trigger happy because they have no one to answer to they no it will covered up

[paulus 26]

 

 

 

 

but there trained to no the difference not just shoot i hope i was right

they are the ones standing in-front of what they believe/are told is an an armed suspect, they have split seconds to decide shoot or not, get it wrong and the chances are it will be them in the body bag, as with all these shooting there is criminality somewhere associated with the victim, take duggen the officer knew he had picked up the pistol so had to make the call as to whether he was a threat or not at the point of the stop,

 

 

 

thats why its good to have debates the grass they used to tell the police he had a gun sent him for it SET UP

 

how can knowingly collecting an illegal firearm whether he was sent to collect it or not be a set up, what did he think he was collecting a truffle. as i said there is nearly always criminal association with the people who get shot by the police

 

 

 

law innocent until proven guilty NOT get shot then prove your not guilty there to trigger happy because they have no one to answer to they no it will covered up

 

so you are now suggesting the police have a blanket shoot to kill policy and a clean up crew for afterwards